The Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever match player stats from the 2026 WNBA season reveal a competitive matchup shaped by scoring runs, rebounding, three-point shooting, and late-game execution. Their most recent regular-season meeting took place on September 20, 2026, when Washington defeated Indiana 93–77 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.
WNBA
+1
The three regular-season meetings in 2026 produced different stories. Washington won the first matchup 104–102 in overtime, Indiana answered with a 78–76 victory in June, and the Mystics closed the season series with a 16-point win in September. These results make the head-to-head comparison more informative than looking at a single final score.
WNBA
+2
This article reviews the confirmed game results, leading player performances, team statistics, historical head-to-head record, and broader 2026 season context. It separates individual-game numbers from full-season records so readers can understand what the statistics actually show.
Quick Answer: Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Player Stats
Washington won the final 2026 regular-season meeting 93–77 on September 20, 2026. Kiki Iriafen led the Mystics with 21 points and 14 rebounds, while Shakira Austin added 20 points and 10 rebounds. Sonia Citron contributed 16 points and nine assists. For Indiana, Caitlin Clark scored 25 points with five assists, and Kelsey Mitchell added 22 points.
WNBA
+1
Washington Mystics
93
21 points and 14 rebounds from Kiki Iriafen
Indiana Fever
77
25 points from Caitlin Clark
Date
September 20, 2026
Competition
WNBA regular season
Venue
Gainbridge Fieldhouse
2026 series
Washington won 2–1
Source: WNBA game summary and published game report.
WNBA
+1
Key statistics from the September game:
- Washington scored 34 points in the opening quarter.
- The Mystics built a 51–30 halftime lead.
- Washington recorded 50 points in the paint, compared with Indiana’s 38.
- Indiana scored 17 fast-break points, more than Washington’s seven.
- The Mystics led by as many as 26 points and never surrendered the lead.
WNBA+1
The final score was not the only important detail. Washington’s early offensive pressure and interior scoring helped establish control, while Indiana’s second-half improvement could not erase the deficit.
1. Latest Match Box Score: September 20, 2026
The final regular-season matchup took place in Indianapolis on September 20. Washington won 93–77 after taking control early and maintaining a comfortable advantage through the fourth quarter. The official WNBA game summary identifies this as a Mystics road victory at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.
WNBA
+1
Quarter-by-quarter scoring
| Quarter | Washington Mystics | Indiana Fever |
|---|---|---|
| First | 34 | 19 |
| Second | 17 | 11 |
| Third | 26 | 31 |
| Fourth | 16 | 16 |
| Final score | 93 | 77 |
Source: official WNBA game summary.
WNBA
Washington’s 15-point first-quarter advantage was the defining stretch. The Mystics added to that lead in the second quarter and went into halftime ahead 51–30.
Indiana responded after the break, scoring 31 points in the third quarter. However, Washington scored 26 of its own and maintained a 16-point cushion entering the final period. Both teams scored 16 points in the fourth, so Indiana never produced the sustained run needed to change the result.
Team performance statistics
| Statistic | Washington | Indiana |
|---|---|---|
| Points in the paint | 50 | 38 |
| Fast-break points | 7 | 17 |
| Largest lead | 26 | 0 |
| Total rebounds | Not shown in summary table | Not shown in summary table |
| Turnovers | 16 | 12 |
| Points off turnovers | 19 | 8 |
| Second-chance points | 6 | 7 |
| Times tied | 0 | 0 |
| Lead changes | 0 | 0 |
Source: WNBA game summary.
WNBA
The figures show that Washington’s advantage came largely from interior scoring and converting opportunities created by turnovers. Indiana had the better fast-break total, but that advantage did not compensate for its slow start.
2. Player Statistics: Washington Mystics
Washington received a balanced contribution from its frontcourt and backcourt. Kiki Iriafen led the way with 21 points and 14 rebounds, while Shakira Austin recorded 20 points and 10 rebounds. Sonia Citron also played a major role as a scorer and facilitator.
WNBA
+1
| Mystics player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Iriafen | 21 | 14 | Not confirmed in the cited recap |
| Shakira Austin | 20 | 10 | Not confirmed in the cited recap |
| Sonia Citron | 16 | Not confirmed in the cited recap | 9 |
| Georgia Amoore | 11 | Not confirmed in the cited recap | Not confirmed in the cited recap |
Note: This table includes the player statistics explicitly reported in the available game recap. Unlisted figures are not treated as zero; they are simply not confirmed by that source.
WNBA
+1
Kiki Iriafen’s double-double
Iriafen’s 21-point, 14-rebound performance was one of the most important individual contributions of the game. A double-double means a player records at least 10 in two statistical categories, such as points and rebounds.
Her scoring helped Washington build its lead, while her rebounding provided extra possessions and defensive control. Her season-level performance was also strong: Basketball-Reference lists her 2026 averages at 15.3 points and 9.6 rebounds per game across 41 appearances.
Basketball Reference
Shakira Austin’s interior impact
Austin added 20 points and 10 rebounds, giving Washington a second player with a double-double. Having two productive frontcourt players made it harder for Indiana to contain Washington’s scoring near the basket.
Sonia Citron’s playmaking
Citron finished with 16 points and nine assists. Her assist total was particularly valuable because it reflected her contribution to teammates’ scoring rather than just her own shooting.
Meanwhile, Georgia Amoore scored 11 points, including three three-pointers according to the published recap. Her perimeter shooting helped Washington maintain offensive balance.
WNBA
+1
3. Player Statistics: Indiana Fever
Indiana had two high-volume scorers in Caitlin Clark and Kelsey Mitchell, but their production was not enough to overcome Washington’s first-half advantage. Clark finished with 25 points and five assists, while Mitchell contributed 22 points.
WNBA
+1
| Fever player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin Clark | 25 | Not confirmed in the cited recap | 5 |
| Kelsey Mitchell | 22 | Not confirmed in the cited recap | Not confirmed in the cited recap |
| Aliyah Boston | 7 | Not confirmed in the cited recap | Not confirmed in the cited recap |
| Raven Johnson | Not specified in the cited recap | Not specified in the cited recap | Not specified in the cited recap |
These are the individual figures reported in the available game recap, not a complete official box score. Missing figures should be checked in the official WNBA game record.
WNBA
Caitlin Clark’s scoring performance
Clark led Indiana with 25 points and five assists. Nevertheless, Washington limited the Fever’s ability to turn individual scoring into a sustained team comeback.
The game report also noted that Clark and Mitchell combined to shoot 14-for-40 from the field, including 6-for-20 from three-point range. Those combined shooting numbers illustrate the difference between accumulating points and converting efficiently.
WNBA
Kelsey Mitchell’s contribution
Mitchell added 22 points, giving Indiana two players with at least 20 points. That scoring output would normally provide a solid foundation for an offense. However, Washington’s early lead forced Indiana to chase the game rather than dictate its pace.
Aliyah Boston’s difficult outing
Boston scored seven points on eight shot attempts, according to the game recap. Foul trouble also affected her performance. Because she is an important interior presence for Indiana, her limited scoring was a relevant factor in a game where Washington scored 50 points in the paint.
WNBA
4. Head-to-Head Record and Previous Meetings
The 2026 regular-season series finished with Washington winning two games and Indiana winning one. The first matchup was an overtime contest, the second was decided by two points, and the third ended with a more decisive Mystics victory.
2026 head-to-head results
| Date | Venue | Result | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis | Washington 104–102 Indiana (OT) | Washington |
| June 8, 2026 | CareFirst Arena, Washington, D.C. | Indiana 78–76 Washington | Indiana |
| September 20, 2026 | Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis | Washington 93–77 Indiana | Washington |
Sources: official WNBA game summaries and published head-to-head results.
WNBA
+3
Washington scored 273 points across the three meetings, while Indiana scored 257. That is a combined scoring average of 91.0 points for Washington and approximately 85.7 for Indiana per game.
The overall point difference was 16 in Washington’s favor, although the series was much closer before September. In fact, the first two games were decided by just two points each.
Historical regular-season record
Sports Reference’s head-to-head data lists the regular-season series between Indiana and Washington at 49 wins apiece through 2026. It also lists four Indiana playoff wins against Washington and no Mystics playoff wins in their historical postseason meetings.
Stathead
These figures distinguish regular-season history from postseason history. The 49–49 regular-season record reflects their longer rivalry, while the 2026 season series specifically finished 2–1 in Washington’s favor.
5. What Happened in the May 15 Overtime Game?
The first 2026 meeting showed how closely matched the teams could be. On May 15, Washington defeated Indiana 104–102 in overtime after a dramatic finish in regulation.
Sonia Citron scored 30 points for Washington, while Kiki Iriafen recorded 25 points and 13 rebounds. Shakira Austin added 19 points. For Indiana, Caitlin Clark finished with 32 points and seven three-pointers, and Kelsey Mitchell scored 24 points.
WNBA
| Player | Team | Points | Other reported statistic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sonia Citron | Washington | 30 | — |
| Kiki Iriafen | Washington | 25 | 13 rebounds |
| Shakira Austin | Washington | 19 | — |
| Caitlin Clark | Indiana | 32 | 7 three-pointers |
| Kelsey Mitchell | Indiana | 24 | — |
The game was notable for its high scoring and late-game execution. Clark hit a three-pointer with 1.7 seconds remaining in regulation to tie the score at 89. Washington then prevailed in overtime, with Citron contributing five points and two assists in the extra period.
WNBA
This matchup is a useful contrast with September. In May, Indiana’s leading scorers produced large totals, but Washington’s combined scoring from Citron, Iriafen, and Austin proved decisive.
6. The June 8 Rematch: Indiana Wins by Two
The second meeting took place at CareFirst Arena on June 8, 2026. Indiana won 78–76, with Clark hitting a three-pointer with 1.2 seconds remaining to secure the victory.
WNBA
| Player | Team | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Caitlin Clark | Indiana | 19 |
| Kelsey Mitchell | Indiana | 15 |
| Aliyah Boston | Indiana | 14 |
| Michaela Onyenwere | Washington | 17 |
These are the leading scoring figures explicitly reported in the game recap; the table is not a complete player box score.
WNBA
Washington had rallied from a 17-point deficit and briefly moved ahead late in the fourth quarter. Shakira Austin scored a layup to give the Mystics a 74–73 lead, but Indiana responded. Sonia Citron then converted two free throws to put Washington ahead before Clark’s final three-pointer decided the contest.
WNBA
The June game demonstrated Indiana’s ability to execute under pressure. It also showed that Washington could recover from a poor stretch and make a close finish of a game that had appeared to be slipping away.
Together, the May and June results set up an interesting contrast with September: the Mystics won both the overtime opener and the final meeting, while the Fever’s only win came in a close finish.
7. 2026 Season Form and Team Comparison
Both teams finished the 2026 regular season with 28 wins and 16 losses according to Basketball-Reference’s season records. Washington advanced to the playoffs but lost its first-round series 2–0 to the Atlanta Dream. Indiana lost its first-round series 2–1 to the Las Vegas Aces.
Basketball Reference
+1
Their overall records were identical, but their season profiles differed.
| Team statistic | Washington Mystics | Indiana Fever |
|---|---|---|
| Regular-season record | 28–16 | 28–16 |
| Points per game | 84.0 | 96.0 |
| Opponent points per game | 82.7 | 90.4 |
| Offensive rating | 106.7 | 117.0 |
| Defensive rating | 105.0 | 110.3 |
| Pace | 77.4 | 81.1 |
| Net rating | +1.7 | +6.7 |
| Playoff result | Lost first round, 0–2 | Lost first round, 1–2 |
Source: Basketball-Reference’s 2026 team season summaries.
Basketball Reference
+1
Indiana’s offensive profile
The published season statistics show Indiana scoring 96.0 points per game, with an offensive rating of 117.0. Its pace of 81.1 was also higher than Washington’s. Those figures point to a team that played quickly and generated a high volume of offense over the season.
However, strong season averages do not guarantee a win in a particular matchup. Against Washington on September 20, Indiana scored only 77 points, well below its listed season scoring average.
Washington’s defensive profile
Washington averaged 82.7 opponent points per game and had a defensive rating of 105.0 in the season summary. Both figures were better than Indiana’s corresponding defensive measures.
Basketball Reference
+1
The September matchup was consistent with Washington’s ability to limit an opponent’s scoring, although a single game cannot prove that a team will perform the same way in every contest.
Data note: Season summaries can be revised as official statistics are corrected. The figures above describe the 2026 regular season, not the three-match head-to-head series or postseason games.
8. Shooting, Rebounding, and Turnovers: What Decided the Match?
The September game highlights three areas that help explain the result: scoring near the basket, ball security, and the timing of offensive production.
Interior scoring
Washington recorded 50 points in the paint, compared with Indiana’s 38. That 12-point difference is meaningful because it shows how effectively the Mystics generated scoring opportunities near the basket.
WNBA
Austin and Iriafen’s scoring totals fit that broader picture. Their combined 41 points gave Washington substantial production from its frontcourt, while both players reached double figures in rebounds.
Turnovers and points off turnovers
Indiana committed 12 turnovers and Washington committed 16. Ordinarily, the lower turnover count is an advantage for Indiana. Yet Washington scored 19 points off turnovers, compared with eight for the Fever.
WNBA
This difference illustrates why the number of turnovers alone does not tell the entire story. The timing and consequences of each turnover matter, as does whether the opposing team converts the resulting possession into points.
Fast-break opportunities
Indiana scored 17 fast-break points, compared with seven for Washington. This suggests that the Fever found opportunities to attack before the Mystics’ defense was fully set.
However, transition scoring was not enough to offset Washington’s stronger interior production and early lead. Indiana needed more consistent half-court offense to close the gap.
Shooting efficiency and the limits of the available data
The published recap confirms that Clark and Mitchell combined to shoot 14-for-40 from the field and 6-for-20 from three-point range. Those figures provide a useful indication of the two leading Fever scorers’ shooting efficiency.
WNBA
A complete team field-goal percentage, free-throw percentage, or total-rebound comparison should be taken from the official box score rather than inferred from the final score. Where those exact figures are not confirmed in the cited game summary, they are left out here.
9. Home and Away Performance
The three 2026 meetings also provide a small sample of how the teams performed at different venues.
| Date | Home team | Away team | Final result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15 | Indiana Fever | Washington Mystics | Washington won 104–102 in OT |
| June 8 | Washington Mystics | Indiana Fever | Indiana won 78–76 |
| September 20 | Indiana Fever | Washington Mystics | Washington won 93–77 |
Sources: WNBA game summaries.
WNBA
+2
Washington won both games played in Indianapolis, while Indiana’s only victory came in Washington. That is an interesting pattern within this series, but it should not be treated as proof of a general home-court advantage or disadvantage.
Three games are a limited sample. Full-season home and away records would be needed to compare each team’s performance across all opponents and venues. The head-to-head results alone do not establish why the teams performed differently on the road.
For readers tracking this matchup, the more useful takeaway is that Washington managed to win two very different games in Indianapolis: an overtime contest in May and a more decisive regular-season finale in September.
10. Tactical Comparison: Why Washington Won the Series
The 2026 results suggest that Washington’s success came from different strengths in different games rather than one repeated formula.
In May, the Mystics relied on a productive group of scorers, with Citron, Iriafen, and Austin all contributing heavily. In September, the frontcourt again played a major role, with Iriafen and Austin combining for 41 points and 24 rebounds.
WNBA
+1
Indiana, meanwhile, had high-scoring performances from Clark and Mitchell across the series. Clark scored 32 points in the overtime loss and 25 in the September defeat. Nevertheless, those individual totals did not always translate into team wins.
WNBA
+1
Several themes stand out:
- Interior presence: Washington’s 50 points in the paint in September highlighted its ability to score near the basket.
- Scoring balance: Citron, Iriafen, and Austin each had significant offensive contributions in the Mystics’ wins.
- Perimeter production: Clark and Mitchell provided much of Indiana’s scoring, but their combined shooting efficiency in September was limited.
- Game starts: Washington’s 34–19 opening quarter created a deficit that Indiana could not erase.
- Late-game execution: Indiana won the June meeting with Clark’s last-second three, showing that it could also prevail in a tight finish.
These are observations from the recorded games, not a claim that one tactical approach will always beat the other. Matchups, player availability, shooting variance, and game situations can all change the outcome.
11. Recent Results and Postseason Context
The September 20 meeting came near the end of the regular season, when both teams were competing for favorable playoff positions. Washington’s 93–77 win improved its record to 26–16 at that point, while Indiana stood at 27–15. Both teams had two regular-season games remaining.
WNBA
+1
Their final season records were 28–16, but their postseason journeys differed. Washington was swept by Atlanta, losing 92–77 and 93–75 in its first-round series. Indiana won one game against Las Vegas before being eliminated 2–1.
Basketball Reference
+1
The broader season context matters because a single head-to-head result does not measure the full quality of a team. Washington’s final win over Indiana demonstrated its ability to exploit matchup advantages, while Indiana’s overall offensive production remained a strength throughout the regular season.
For readers reviewing the latest confirmed matchup statistics, the September game remains the most relevant direct comparison. The postseason results offer additional context, but they should not be combined with regular-season head-to-head totals without clearly labeling the competition.
12. Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the latest Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever game in 2026?
The Washington Mystics won 93–77 on September 20, 2026, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The win gave Washington a 2–1 advantage in the 2026 regular-season series.
WNBA
+1
2. Who scored the most points in the September 20 matchup?
Caitlin Clark led all players with 25 points for Indiana. Kiki Iriafen led Washington with 21 points, followed by Shakira Austin with 20.
WNBA
3. How many rebounds did Kiki Iriafen record against Indiana?
Iriafen grabbed 14 rebounds in the September 20 game, alongside 21 points. That performance gave her a double-double.
WNBA
4. How did Caitlin Clark perform against Washington in 2026?
Clark scored 32 points in the May 15 overtime loss, 19 points in Indiana’s June 8 victory, and 25 points in the September 20 defeat. These figures show that she scored consistently across the three meetings, even though Indiana won only one of them.
WNBA
+2
5. What was the 2026 head-to-head record between the Mystics and Fever?
Washington won two of the three regular-season games, while Indiana won one. The results were 104–102 in overtime for Washington, 78–76 for Indiana, and 93–77 for Washington.
WNBA
+2
6. Which team scored more points in the paint in the latest game?
Washington scored 50 points in the paint, compared with Indiana’s 38. That 12-point difference was one of the clearest statistical advantages in the September matchup.
WNBA
7. What were the teams’ 2026 regular-season records?
Both the Mystics and Fever finished the regular season with 28 wins and 16 losses. Washington was eliminated in the first playoff round by Atlanta, while Indiana was eliminated by Las Vegas in three games.
Basketball Reference
+1
8. Where can I find the complete player box score?
The official WNBA game box score for September 20, 2026 is the best place to verify complete individual statistics, including shooting, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and minutes played. Use the official record when exact figures are needed beyond those included in the published recap.
WNBA
Conclusion
The Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever match player stats show that Washington won the 2026 regular-season series 2–1, including a 93–77 victory on September 20. Kiki Iriafen, Shakira Austin, and Sonia Citron led the Mystics’ final-game effort, while Caitlin Clark and Kelsey Mitchell supplied Indiana’s main scoring. Washington’s interior production and strong opening quarter were decisive in the final meeting. Both teams finished 28–16, but their postseason results differed. These confirmed results provide a clear picture of the rivalry without relying on unsupported predictions.

Hi, I’m Trevor Dean. As the administrator, I manage FindZName while helping create unique nicknames, creative usernames, and useful naming ideas that inspire confidence and make every online identity memorable.









